Fraunhofer IAO recently highlighted the significant gap between aspiration and reality in hybrid working models. The researchers came to a clear conclusion: without digital measurability, companies lose control. This finding is particularly evident in Industry 4.0. Machines provide precise data. Production lines run automatically. But when it comes to knowledge work, many companies still rely on subjective assessments. This is a disconnect that is becoming increasingly significant.
This impression is reinforced by the latest Microsoft Work Trend Index. 68 percent of managers express doubts about the productivity of their teams working from home. At the same time, telemetry data from teams shows stable or increasing performance values. In a production environment, such a contradiction would be inconceivable. There, decisions are based on facts, not assumptions. Hybrid collaboration also needs this kind of clarity.
Hybrid work will only become a reliable part of value creation when companies manage it as consistently as they manage their technical systems. The basis for this is modern tools that make work visible, structure processes and place management on a robust data basis.
Collaboration tools as the foundation of hybrid performance
In hybrid teams, the quality of collaboration depends crucially on the digital working environment. Collaboration tools form the daily workspace – and determine how clearly tasks are distributed, information is shared and decisions are documented. This is particularly relevant for Industry 4.0 companies because technical processes are already highly standardised. If a comparable structure is lacking in knowledge work, unnecessary disruptions arise.
Microsoft Teams, Slack and Asana provide the basis for reliable processes. They bundle communication, tasks and files in central locations. Digital boards such as Miro and whiteboard solutions support joint planning. This structure reduces the amount of coordination required because everyone involved knows where information is located and how processes work.
However, the decisive step lies in clear standards. Once it has been determined which tool is used for what, orientation is created. Teams work in a more coordinated manner because they are guided by a common logic. This turns the digital environment into an infrastructure that reliably supports hybrid work and increases the speed at which projects progress.
Analytics platforms that show what really works
Hybrid working makes many processes invisible. Managers see less, but have to make more decisions. Analytics platforms close this information gap. They capture communication patterns, focus times, handovers or bottlenecks and reveal how teams actually work together.
Modern solutions such as Microsoft Viva Insights go far beyond simple activity measurements. They show how meeting structures are developing, how fragmented teams are working, and where delays are occurring. This enables an assessment that works regardless of location and presence.
This has an important advantage for industrial companies: workflows can be better linked to technical processes. When teams make decisions faster or handovers run smoothly, this has a direct impact on projects, development cycles or supply chains. Managers thus receive information that they could previously only obtain through intensive personal exchanges.
Analytics do not provide control. They provide orientation. They reveal patterns that help to improve workflows in a targeted manner and make responsibilities clearer.
KPI systems that make remote work measurable
While production is controlled using clear key performance indicators, such standards are often lacking for hybrid knowledge work. One reason for this is that many companies have long relied on traditional indicators such as attendance. However, these values lose their significance as soon as teams start working remotely.
KPI systems provide a solution. They measure aspects that actually provide relevant information: the quality of results, the reliability of handovers, decision-making speeds or the stability of project processes. These key figures show how well a team is organised and how reliably it works together.
Modern systems automatically record these values by combining data from collaboration and project platforms. This enables managers to recognise developments earlier and set priorities more clearly. This approach is particularly suitable for Industry 4.0. The logic of data-based process control has long been established. Applied to hybrid work, it creates a transparent system that supports decision-making and promotes responsibility.
Integration into the Industry 4.0 tech stack
Individual tools are not enough. Only integration into the existing technology stack makes hybrid work efficient. In modern industrial companies, ERP, MES and automation systems are closely networked. If collaboration and analytics data are not connected, media breaks occur throughout the entire organisation.
An integrated architecture ensures that information arrives where it is needed. Delays become visible earlier. Dependencies can be better controlled. Managers have a clear overview of work statuses without having to rely on additional coordination.
For this integration to work, data quality must be right. Systems can only support precise decisions if they work with reliable information. Companies therefore benefit from clear rules for data collection, maintenance and responsibilities. Such a structure not only strengthens the efficiency of hybrid teams, but also increases the confidence with which decisions are made.
Opportunities and risks of data-based hybrid management
The use of digital tools opens up great opportunities for companies. They understand workflows better, can manage workloads in a more targeted manner and make decisions based on clear data. This creates transparency and improves collaboration across locations. For many professionals, this clarity is an important factor in feeling secure in hybrid structures.
At the same time, companies must proceed with sensitivity. Data protection remains a key issue. Employees need to know what data is being collected and what it is being used for. Open communication and clear guidelines are essential here. Without them, the impression of control quickly arises, which undermines trust.
Another risk lies in acceptance. Tools only deliver their benefits if they are used by everyone. Unclear processes or an overload of platforms, on the other hand, lead to frustration. Companies should therefore establish a clear logic and tailor technological decisions to actual requirements. The clearer the structure, the greater the willingness to use new systems consistently.
Conclusion
Hybrid work requires clear digital control. Research and practice clearly show that companies with modern tools and structured processes can significantly increase their performance. The combination of collaboration tools, analytics solutions and reliable KPI systems creates a clear framework that relieves management and stabilises teams.
This results in a clear advantage for Industry 4.0. Companies that are already technically well positioned can seamlessly integrate hybrid knowledge work into their existing logic. As a result, digitalisation is not only visible in production, but also in the way people work together.
The future of hybrid work belongs to those organisations that use technology consciously and use data responsibly. Those who master the digital beat work faster, more clearly and more reliably – regardless of where their employees are located.
Your next step
Would you like to not only enable hybrid work in an industrial environment, but also manage it reliably? Modern collaboration and analytics systems offer a clear basis for this, when used correctly. Companies that measure and specifically improve their digital working models gain speed, stability and reliability.
Let's talk about how you can make your hybrid working environment visible, strengthen your leadership and link technological systems in a way that delivers real value. Clear, data-driven and aligned with the requirements of Industry 4.0. We look forward to hearing from you.
References
- Fraunhofer IAO (2023): Performance hybrider Arbeit.
- Microsoft (2023): Work Trend Index – Will AI Fix Work?
- Deloitte (2023): Measuring workforce productivity (Digital Workplace Productivity+ Series, Part 2).
- EY (2022): How technology can activate your hybrid work ecosystem.
- Boston Consulting Group – BCG (2023): Making Flexible Working Models Work.
- McKinsey (2025): A new operating model for people management: More personal, more tech, more human.
.png)
